EPSTEIN
page 2 / 656 . OCR, unverified
regardless of the amount and type of work done, particularly one for $2.1M. So we
have no alternative but to go to court to resolve this issue. We are sending you
this letter because the attorney representative is using the threat of a breach as
leverage to get his fees. I don't believe the government's power to indict and
incarcerate should be used to assist a private lawyer in collecting an exorbitant
legal fee. Thus we are putting you on notice, and asking that if you disagree with
our legal opinion that a suit is not in conflict with the NPA, to tell us without
delay.
Cordially yours,
MW:RC:RB/wg
Martin G. Weinberg, Esq.
Robert D. Critton, Jr.
Roy Black
Roy Blac
Black. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A.
EFTA00213312
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0020__EFTA00213313.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0020
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00213313.pdf
----------------------------------------
From:
To:
Subject: RE: he who must not be named
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:47:48 +0000
Importance: Normal
Yes. I read it. I was reading to. the quote from the lawyer who asked about what was more traumatic — the 3
abortions or the time spent with Epstein. He then said, "is anyone else quoted in the article?" and I looked down
and saw that I was quoted in the article. It was a fun morning for me.
Assistant U.S. Attorney
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
From:
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:08 AM
To:
Subject: he who must not be named
The morning Palm Beach Post has a front page article on Epstein and the victims. If only we could turn back the hands of
time!!!!,
EFTA00213313
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0020__EFTA00213314.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0020
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00213314.pdf
----------------------------------------
From:
To:
Subject: Epstein, Part IV
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:20:17 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 20100124_PB_Post_Article.pdf
When it rains, it pours . . . .
This was on the front page of the Palm Beach Post today. It makes me very glad that I am no longer in civil
practice, because I am amazed at how low these civil lawyers are allowed to go. This also increases my concern
about releasing the names of the additional potential victims because of what Epstein's lawyers may do to them.
And when do I get to tell someone that I did not "craft" this deal?
Assistant U.S. Attome
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
EFTA00213314
--- SOURCE: VOL00009__IMAGES__0020__EFTA00213315.txt ---
METADATA_SOURCE: VOL00009IMAGES0020
METADATA_FILENAME: EFTA00213315.pdf
----------------------------------------
Victims seeking sex offender's millions see painful pasts used against them
Page I of 2
The Palm Beach Post
Print this page
Close
Victims seeking sex offender's millions see painful pasts used
against them
By JANE MUSGRAVE
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Updated: 11:40 p.m. Saturday. Jan. 23. 2010
Posted: 11:30 p.m. Saturday. Jan. 23.2010
One was in a Hobe Sound trailer when her father beat his girlfriend's 8-year-old son to death. Another watched her
boyfriend kill himself. Still another was molested at 12 by her best friend's brother and was raped again three years later.
Now their violent, traumatic and just plain sad lives are being used against them.
Attorneys for multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein are dredging up the most intimate details of the lives of more than a dozen
women who are seeking millions from the sex offender. The women claim he lured them to his Palm Beach mansion for
sexually charged massages when some were as young as 14.
In court papers, Epstein's attorneys scoff at the women's claims that they were traumatized after being paid $200 to give
Epstein, now 57, massages that, for most, led to sex. If they were so traumatized, his attorneys ask, why did they return
10, 20, 50 or as many as 100 times? If they were so traumatized, why did they take advantage of Epstein's offer to double
their money by getting dozens and dozens of other girls to participate?
Nothing is off limits, attorney Robert Critton has argued in court papers. To keep the women's hands off his client's money,
he is seeking to prove that they had deep psychological problems before they claim they were introduced to Epstein .
"Because Epstein purportedly has 'lots of money,' they claim his actions caused their horrific damages," Critton wrote,
asking a judge to force the women to answer his questions. "Yet performing in the 'Champagne Room,' dancing at strip
clubs and prostituting themselves ... has no relevance to their claimed damages in this case? Are (they) and their
attorneys seriously making this argument?"
When given a chance to question the women, his tactics have been bare-knuckle.
"I want you to tell the ladies and gentlemen of the jury whether or not aborting three fetuses is more traumatic than giving
a man a massage in the nude," attorney Mark Luttier, Critton's partner, asked one of the women in a recent deposition.
Reluctantly, the woman, who, like most of the others filed a civil suit using a pseudonym, admitted the abortions were